Saturday, October 31, 2015

Fr Jame Fryar FSSP Letter On Anthony Perlas Of Latin Mass Society....


“Anthony Perlas (Anthony Tridentine) arrived in los Angeles before Lent, this year. He remained a few months and then moved to Chicago. He was a recent convert from atheism, quite new to the Latin Mass and we taught him how to serve. He asked me if I would be willing to join him with an online Latin Rosary that he broadcasted on Wednesdays during Lent. I was happy to participate in that good cause. He also mentioned interest in applying to the seminary.

Before I met him, he had been entrusted with the care of the “Latin Mass Society” at Belmont Abbey College. This was a campus organization. It is my understanding that Anthony subsequently appropriated himself of the group, and kept it as his own after graduating and leaving the College.

One thing I repeatedly noticed about Anthony is that he does not take advice. While he claims to have a “spiritual director” that he allegedly consults, he never tells anyone who this spiritual director is. When people started wondering if it was I, it made me realize that he probably hasn’t got one.

At any rate, what began as a fetish for chapel veils has deteriorated to ever – reaching new lows, including full nudity, blasphemies against Our Blessed Mother, heretical content, sacrilegious posts, as well as quotes from Hitler.

I have refrained until now from posting a public statement, because we are all trying to talk sense to Anthony, and he has disregarded, unfriended, and ignored every outreach. I gave him time to consider my advice to no avail.

I know a few young ladies who helped him with photos. They thought they were helping a good cause. When they asked him, as I also asked, to have our names removed from his sites, we all got the same response: “Absolutely! But I am very busy right now and will remove it later.” – That “later” never happens, and he has not removed the content related to me, or the FSSP, or of these young ladies.

I am obliged to give up trying to talk sense to him. I disassociate myself in any way from his corrupt websites. The Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter has nothing to do with him, and he is not a member in any manner. Furthermore, the young ladies whose images appear on his sites should not be accomplices, because it is unclear who has requested that such content be removed, or what has been photo shopped.

Anthony has no firm theological formation, and has no authority to speak on behalf of the Latin Mass or the Latin Mass community. The content on his sites have no approval of the FSSP, or any other community related to the Extraordinary Form of the Mass.

Finally, I strongly encourage parents to forbid their children to friend him on Facebook or follow him on other social media. His sites are perverse and have nothing to do with the Latin Mass. I encourage young ladies not to be involved with him or agree to be his “models”. This would not be helping, but rather of detriment to spread of the Extraordinary Form.

Let us all pray for the salvation of his soul, and that the content that he has posted be removed so as not to continue this mockery of the Sacred.”

Fr J Fryar FSSP

October 23rd 2015

Michael Voris' Church Militant Hired Filipino Neo-Nazi Nationalist & Purveyor Of Soft Porn Anthony Perlas (a.k.a. “Anthony Tridentine”)


Michael Voris (or Gary as his birth certificate & I like to call him) & his Church Militant hired a filipino neo-nazi and purveyor of smut - the relationship did not last more than a month.

 Who is Perlas? According to the man who plays with fire Steve Skojec of 1P5 fame:
Anthony Perlas. Perlas runs a website called the Latin Mass Society. His work included both photos and videos, and featured attractive young women wearing chapel veils, all shot in a contemporary style that showed a talent and understanding of the craft.
Perlas is a little strange to say the least - his political views are Nationalist and he makes a living off of soft porn. His Latin Mass Society is certainly not legit:
The Latin Mass Society never runs from their enemies. It is here that we shall make our stand until our last dying breathe. All the nations of the earth shall see the power and glory of the Seroptia. There is no creation more powerful than the highest of all angels whom we possess. Modeling and Catholicism shall be infused into one flawless medium. I hereby place my hand unto the Great Seal of Seroptia and authorize and establish hedge protection on Jenelle and all our models and render her works as good in Jesus’s name. All negativity shall be returned to where they came from and you are bounded by the Great Seal of Seroptia with the intercession of the Blessed Mary Ever A Virgin. The saints command you to obey. Father commands you to obey. Our lady commands you to obey. Our models are now wrapped in her mantle and as her property. The Holy Ghost shall bring warmth with its tender loving presence and thou shall be discorded and unhappy you envious enemy. Kneel and be crushed by the heel of the Immaculate Virgin foul creature and haters who blaspheme Gods precious Angels who are meant to know, love and serve Him and who seek Him yet you cause division to turn our models away from God. You’re stripped off all your interferences and you are powerless.
Strange and bizarre.

Here is a modeling photo of the Filipino Neo-Nazi Nationalist & Purveyor Of Soft Porn:

Maybe He's Mixed???

I always thought it funny when non-aryans promote Aryanism - bizarre.

Thanks to Steve Skojec of 1P5 fame for going into the snake pit to expose this guy more or less. Still on Skojec's part it was pure foolishness to be in contact with Perlas for so long.

Skojec almost involved his own daughter with this guy:
Anthony wrote to me once to ask if he could contact my daughter as a potential model. (At the time, I didn’t think anything of it, and figured she would say no. I was right – she ignored his request. And I’m very glad she did.)
So here's the part where Skojec claims that Perlas works for Voris for three weeks:
We didn’t interact again until I heard that he’d moved from Los Angeles to Detroit and taken a job with Church Militant. When I saw him post that it hadn’t worked out after only a few weeks, I reached out to him. He didn’t want to talk about it.
Unidentified & Perlas & Ryan Fitzgerald

Who is RYAN FITZGERALD?
Ryan Fitzgerald is a staff writer and producer for Church Militant. He's currently working on a Master's degree in Theology from Franciscan University in Steubenville. He has a BA in Film from Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles, where he majored in Screenwriting and Philosophy. After graduation, he completed the writing program at Act One in Hollywood. He's a parishioner at Assumption Grotto in Detroit and was married in Houston, his hometown, this past June.
Look with Voris obsession with the SSPX Pope Benedict & Hands off policy on Heretic Pope Francis  one can readily discern that there is demonic activity at the Warehouse in Detroit.


Thursday, October 29, 2015

Gary Voris: "Attacking Pope Francis Is Going To Backfire And Damage The Cause Of Orthodoxy"

Kissing Pope Francis' Ass Is Gonna Backfire....

Who is Gary kidding?

Pope Francis is a Heretic. To defend his words & deeds is to defend Heresy.

Both Pope Francis and Gary Voris are possessed by evil spirits.

Here the full article....


Our Lady at La Salette said that there will be a forerunner to the Antichrist, who will raise an army of men from many Nations.  Our Lady at Fatima said that a group of soldiers will one day kill the Fatima Pope, this group of soldiers belong to the army of the Forerunner to the Antichrist and the forerunner's name is Gary.....


Monday, October 26, 2015

Gary Voris Off The Rails - BASHES Pope Benedict XVI Blames Benedict For The Synod! Is Gary Possessed? WILL GARY TRY TO MURDER BENEDICT?


THE VORTEX—BENEDICT’S FINGERPRINTS

So with the incredible confusion surrounding the now-concluded Synod, self-styled Catholic conservatives are piling on Pope Francis, scoring points and being hailed as brave and courageous for taking on the Pope.

It's a cheap way to score points. Have things accelerated under Pope Francis in a negative trajectory? Sure. But the Catholic media and blogs, comprised almost entirely of concerned Catholics without a shred of professional secular experience, were almost silent as the problem was developing before Francis.

We and others have rightfully pointed out the heresy, heterodoxy and dissent among very key players here at the Synod, placed in their roles by Pope Francis. But a very important historical question is being overlooked here: How did they rise to the levels that Pope Francis could appoint them to these posts in the first place? Let's go down a quick overview of some of the more troublesome prelates:

Cardinal Baldisseri was consecrated bishop by John Paul and placed on the powerful congregation for bishops by Pope Benedict.

Homosexualist Bruno Forte was made archbishop by John Paul in 2004 and personally laid hands on by then Cdl. Ratzinger, one of only 26 men ever made bishop by him.

Homosexualist Donald Wuerl was made bishop by John Paul and created a cardinal by Pope Benedict in 2010.

New Zealand's John Dew was made cardinal by Pope Francis, true — but he was consecrated a bishop by John Paul.

Women-deacon-supporter Canadian Paul-Andre Durocher was made bishop by John Paul II in 1997 and made archbishop by Benedict in 2011.

Essentially heretical Cdl. Marx was made bishop by John Paul in 1996, and it was Pope Benedict who placed him the position to become this troublesome by making him cardinal in 2010.

John Paul made Walter Kasper both bishop in 1989 and cardinal in 2001 — this after then Cdl. Ratzinger had already publicly crossed swords with him over the whole "Holy Communion for divorced and remarried" question, which Kapser had already been rambling on about for 30 years.

Exceedingly liberal Charles Palmer-Buckle, the only African to talk openly in favor of the Communion question, was made bishop and archbishop by John Paul.

Another exceedingly liberal African, Peter Turkson, was made bishop and archbishop by Pope John Paul.

Cardinal Oswald Gracias of India, a Pope Francis favorite, was made a cardinal by Pope Benedict.

Brisbane Australia's archbishop Mark Coleridge was raised to his high place as archbishop by Pope Benedict.

And all kinds of troublesome prelates — Roger Mahoney, homosexualist Joseph Bernardin, sex-abuse covering-up Cdl. Danneels, Theodore McCarrick — were all made cardinals by Pope St. John Paul.

And the list of prelates who trouble Catholic media types has one more name on it made cardinal by John Paul: Jorge Bergoglio. During all these appointments by John Paul, one of his most intimate advisers was then Cdl. Joseph Ratzinger, hailed as a hero by many in the "conservative" crowd. Once he became Pope, he continued a string of very questionable and troublesome appointments. While he did appoint some good guys, as Pope Francis has, he has enough bad guys on his roll to raise some serious questions — including some of the big names at this Synod, like Baldisseri, homosexualist Forte, Wuerl and Marx, who owe their current prestige directly to Pope Benedict.

And lest anyone think this is attacking the Pope, Joseph Ratzinger isn't the Pope anymore.

And this is a question that has been completely overlooked during all the hand-wringing going on here at the Synod, in all the analysis and reporting in the Catholic media world. The whole reason we are here in October of 2015 is because of what Pope Benedict did in February of 2013: He resigned, abdicated, abandoned the office of Pope — a monumental action, not yet fully recognized for the enormous earthquake it caused in the Church.

Forget for a moment all the rumors that it was done for blackmail or financial threats or whatever; we may never know. What’s important is he did it. He surrendered to whatever forces he thought he could not resist. The Holy Father abandoned his flock, and it was that single action that has brought all this about. Francis may have lit a fuse here, but Pope Benedict laid the dynamite. He has now set in motion a series of events that the Church may take decades, or even perhaps, God forbid, centuries to recover from without the much-longed for and prayed for direct heavenly intervention.

For the past eight years, ChurchMilitant.com has been calling out the problem of these bishops and many others. Our new book Militant spells much of it out in detail. Yet many of the Catholic blogs and websites — some of whom actually told us privately to not to do that — are now more than happy to strut around damning Francis and the Synod while ignoring the real underlying cause of this chaos.

Pope Benedict's fingerprints are all over this Synod. Many of these troubling characters were put into their places by him personally and others indirectly. When everyone in the Catholic blogs and websites is calling on "clarity" from Pope Francis, where are the appeals from these same websites for Pope Benedict to say something? Surely, of all people, you would think he is disturbed and troubled at heart at all this madness — madness propagated by his men anointed at his own hand. Shouldn't he be issuing a public statement regarding heresies? He resigned because of health reasons, but going on three years later, his health seems just fine.

Contrast that to Pope John Paul, who actually had a health issue — recall that scene where, struggling mightily with Parkinson's, he issued his last blessing from the window of the Apostolic Palace shortly before his death, setting an example beyond words. When Pope Benedict was elected he said publicly, "Pray for me that I do not flee for fears of the wolves" — yet that is exactly what he did. He turned around and ran away, abandoning the flock to wolves he had let in the sheepfold.

Believe me, it's not that ChurchMilitant.com doesn't see the problems with this pontificate — but we think there's enough blame to go around that all guilty parties should be exposed, not just scoring cheap clickbait points by piling on. The reality is that whatever comes out of this Synod, many of these malformed, evil, wicked clerics are simply going to return to their dioceses or high offices and keep doing what they've been doing for years, even decades, trying to crush the authentic Faith. The Synod was an attempt to institutionalize it and make it official.

What Benedict's resignation has done is fundamentally change the papacy. It has caused a cataclysm far greater than what has followed in the wake of the Second Vatican Council. You barely hear a reference to Vatican II here at all. It's all about Pope Francis. Immediately following the Council, liberals and progressives spoke in terms of the Church as if She hadn't existed before 1965. Today, they speak in even more narrow terms: as if She'd never existed before Pope Francis. Even John Paul's 1980 heralded exhortation on the family, Familiaris Consortio, has been essentially pushed aside.

The damage of Benedict’s resignation is now coming into full focus. The Church has been reduced in the common mind to just the Pope — nothing else. What Pope Benedict did may even rise to the level of immoral. Recall that there is the history of St. Peter running out of Rome when Nero fired up the persecution. Suddenly on the Via Appia Our Blessed Lord appeared to him walking toward Rome, and Peter said to Him, Quo Vadis, Domine? "Where are you going, Lord?" And Jesus answered, "I'm going to Rome to be crucified again."

Peter got the message and turned back around, went into Rome and was martyred. That is precisely what Benedict did not do. And because of it, he has introduced an element into the papacy that may never be capable of being overcome except by another direct intervention by Our Lord. Ironically, Pope Benedict is the one who invented the term the "hermeneutic of continuity" versus the "hermeneutic of rupture" — yet he is the very one who has introduced this rupture and its resulting confusion into the papacy.

In an era where fatherhood has become so disgraced, Pope Benedict is the one who will be remembered as abandoning his children in the hour of their great need. This is the kind of analysis that Catholics need to hear, not just hand-wringing and piling on Pope Francis.

***

VIDEO: Gary The Forerunner To The Antichrist Hates Pope Benedict......The Vortex—Benedict's Fingerprints

Saturday, October 24, 2015

THIS IS WHY MONARCHY IS DANGEROUS! TradCatKnight (Eric Gajewski) Claims To Be The Great Catholic Monarch! LOL!


OK the purpose of the forerunner to the Antichrist blog is to identify the forerunner to the Antichrist.

Gary Voris is the top contender.

Gary is building himself up as a leader of Roman Catholic men. Gary has not yet claimed to be the Great Monarch but he constantly hints at it.

Another one that actual claims to be the Great Monarch is Eric Gajewski of TradCatKnight

Eric is a fraud:


Eric buys all his views to fool many into thinking that his site is very popular. I was fooled to some extent and I wondered why posts on his blog on Catholic spirituality etc would generate so many views. Granted he had crazy stuff like Planet X and there are many crazy people out there who like reading that crazy stuff - but why would these same crazy people read anything on Catholic spirituality or morals etc? They wouldn't. So I wondered why I didn't get the same or similar traffic on all my posts on Meditation on the Sunday Gospels or on the Passion of Our Lord and Savior. Now I know why. Eric is exposed as a fraud in the above video. 

At the 32.50 mark Eric is exposed as publicly manifesting himself as the Great Monarch. This is why Monarchy is dangerous - very dangerous. Any deluded fool can claim to have royal blood and many do Eric is one of them.

No Roman Catholic in is right mind should ever cling to Monarchy as a means to restore all things in Christ. Many pretenders will arise just like Eric and claim to be this or that, when in fact they are not.

The forerunner to the Antichrist will do the same - claiming to be of Royal blood etc.

Is Eric the forerunner to the Antichrist? No, probably not. The above video should effectively shut his fraudulent operation down. 

The forerunner to the Antichrist will raise an army of men from many nations who will one day kill the Fatima Pope and faithful. This army will be real - it will not be a fake Internet Army created by some hit farm in Bangladesh.

So Eric is done.

Gary Voris is still the best contender to be the actual forerunner to the Antichrist.

All frauds love Monarchy because anyone can claim to have royal blood. Don't get sucked in by the Royal blood frauds.

As for the Divinely Ordained Authority of the Holy Roman Emperor can never be a fraud or will ever deceive because that man has to be elected by the Seven Imperial Electors. And the Seven Imperial Electors are called Proclaimers of Divine Providence who will one day elect a man chosen by the Blessed Trinity.

Again Monarchist are a danger to the restoration of all things in Christ and most monarchists will be found in the camp of the forerunner to the Antichrist.

VIDEO: TRADCAT KNIGHT A FRAUD! TradCatKnight (Eric Gajewski) Deception Cult Exposed

Saturday, October 17, 2015

Gary The Forerunner To The Antichrist Calls These Prelates Satan’s Children Wearing The Robes Of Judas

There is evil here in Rome, evil being orchestrated by sons of Satan Gary Voris>>>>>>
“A forerunner of the Antichrist, with his troops gathered from several nations, will fight against the true Christ, the only Saviour of the world. He will shed much blood and will want to annihilate the worship of God to make himself be looked upon as a God. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)
Gary the forerunner to the Antichrist is calling others the offspring of the Devil before anyone calls Gary the offspring of the Devil.

I guess if you're the first to call others names that means that no one is allow to call you by the same!!! LOL!

Gary the forerunner to the Antichrist has called these Prelates the offspring of the Devil wearing the robes of Judas:
  1. Cdl. Lorenzo Baldisseri,
  2. Abp. Bruno Forte,
  3. Cdl. Donald Wuerl,
  4. Cdl. Daneels,
  5. Cdl. John Dew,
  6. Abp. Paul Andre Durocher,
  7. Fr. Thomas Rosica
That's just a partial list of who Gary considers sons of Satan.

The thing is, is that Gary himself defends the wicked actions and heretical doctrine of Pope Francis...but so do the men listed above......



Satan Has Offspring. You Bet He Does: Is Gary Voris A Offspring Of The Devil? Gary Born Of A Incubus?

"Satan Has Offspring. You Bet He Does" Gary Voris

One thing to notice is that the Devil is always first. It is a tool of Satan to be the first in order to fool the unwary - for instance if a wicked soul accuses some innocent soul of some crime you can be sure that the wicked soul is the one that committed the crime - its call projection. It happens more than you think - women are very good at this wicked game.

Enter Voris or Gary the forerunner to the Antichrist as I like to call him.

He publishes a book about his life so that everyone can soak up his lies, he will claim to be a saint in youth but turns into a great sinner in his later life and converts back to the faith by the prayers of his mother, and now Voris is the Great Saint sent from on high to save the Church and the World.

Voris, in case none of you are catching on, is claiming that he is the Great Monarch to save us all!

So any criticism leveled at the Great man will be considered in bad taste.

However...there is one small problem with Gary projecting himself as the Great Monarch.....Gary defends the wicked actions of Pope Francis.

There is no other proof needed than the fact that Gary defends Heretical Pope Francis - this is evidence enough that Gary is not the Great Monarch.

On the contrary Gary is the forerunner to the Antichrist spoken of by Our Lady at La Salette & Fatima.

List of reasons that Gary is the best candidate to be Forerunner to the Antichrist:

1. Defends wicked actions & heretical doctrine of Pope Francis
2. Claims that the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary has been done.
3. Claims that JPII is the Fatima Pope who is murdered in the Secret of Fatima.
4. Goes by his middle name Michael to sound more Catholic
5. Refuses to go by Gary......
6. Attacks the SSPX
7. Hair like a woman (Apoc. reference)

Will add to the list....

Question: Is Gary born of a Incubus? Sound ridiculous? Yea..I know you would rather believe that Voris might be the Great Monarch born in exile.....whatever..

Did you know that the Arch Heretic Martin Luther was born of Incubus?

Here:
There are, that write Luther to have been born of an Incubus (that is of a filthy spirit abusing women in place of man) which oppressed his mother, when she was a servant in a common bath in Germany: but I know not of what credit it is: the credit dependeth of that matron of lypsta, which reported it, and knew well his mother. Prateolus
Are Incubus real? Yes of course. St Augustine said that to deny such is heresy.

It is said that the Antichrist will be born by an incubus - Our Lady said that the Antichrist will be born of a false Virgin. Meaning that a Incubus will impregnate the false virgin

Succubus gets the sperm from a man and the Incubus plants the seed into the woman.

One question can be asked from what man was the seed taken from in order to impregnate Luther's mother?

Think about this for a moment - who is wicked enough to be the father of Martin Luther? I'm sure the seed was not just ordinary seed from some farmer. No, the seed that the devil implanted into Luther's mother had to come from a wicked man, a very wicked man.

I do know that the seed of man breaks down over time and the Incubus does not have much time in planting the seed into some women. At least that's what the opinion was back in the day.

But today we have a way of preserving sperm:


Yea those sperm banks have it all covered:
Sperm can be frozen indefinitely. There have been normal pregnancies from sperm stored frozen for 12 years. The efficacy of the freezing is questionable when it has been frozen for more than 12 years. Each individual's sperm reacts differently to the freezing process. Jul 9, 2014
So if modern man can preserve sperm for 12 years or indefinitely, then I would think that Evil Spirits can preserve sperm for a longer period. Meaning the the seed that gave birth to Martin Luther was probably seed from Judas himself! That's 1,450 year old sperm!

Same goes for the Antichrist - the seed that gives birth to the Antichrist will probably be from Judas as well.

Same goes for the Forerunner to the Antichrist Gary. If Gary is the forerunner to the Antichrist then Gary is the offspring of Judas!

Yea I know you don't want to believe such things.....but again you will believe that Gary is the long awaited Great Monarch...LOL!


Hilary White Claims That Gary Voris The Forerunner To The Antichrist Has A Sense Of Humor!!

Gary Voris The Forerunner To The Antichrist
“A forerunner of the Antichrist, with his troops gathered from several nations, will fight against the true Christ, the only Saviour of the world. He will shed much blood and will want to annihilate the worship of God to make himself be looked upon as a God. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879) 
Well it seems that the man who will raise a Ethno-Nationalist Army to murder the Fatima Pope has a sense of humor.

To remind you of the upcoming murderous event: 
“J.M.J.

The third part of the secret revealed at the Cova da Iria-Fatima, on 13 July 1917.

I write in obedience to you, my God, who command me to do so through his Excellency the Bishop of Leiria and through your Most Holy Mother and mine.

After the two parts which I have already explained, at the left of Our Lady and a little above, we saw an Angel with a flaming sword in his left hand; flashing, it gave out flames that looked as though they would set the world on fire; but they died out in contact with the splendour that Our Lady radiated towards him from her right hand: pointing to the earth with his right hand, the Angel cried out in a loud voice: ‘Penance, Penance, Penance!'. And we saw in an immense light that is God: ‘something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it' a Bishop dressed in White ‘we had the impression that it was the Holy Father'. Other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of which there was a big Cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark; before reaching there the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after another the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions. Beneath the two arms of the Cross there were two Angels each with a crystal aspersorium in his hand, in which they gathered up the blood of the Martyrs and with it sprinkled the souls that were making their way to God.

Tuy-3-1-1944”.
A silly girl writer has testified to the fact that Gary makes people laugh at her birthday party....Aaaawwww... that is so cute!
I’m going to say it again: I like Mike. I consider him a friend (we have had dinners and drinks whenever we’re on the same continent and he even attended my 45th birthday party, to great hilarity all round) and I like and respect his work. I know he’s done a huge amount of good helping Catholics understand the seriousness of the crisis, and he has done some great work exposing certain prelates, in a Catholic journalistic atmosphere that is almost stifling when it comes to bishops. We don’t agree on every point, (and some of the people he works with can be a little… odd… now and then) but the points of disagreement aren’t at issue for the moment. Hilary White Read More>>>>
I wonder what Hilary will think of Gary when Gary earns the title of Forerunner to the Antichrist  just after the moment when Gary shoots that arrow into the heart of the Fatima Pope:



Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Voris & Crew Post Article On The Miracle Of The Sun? Voris Is The Same Man Who Thinks Russia Has Been Consecrated To The Immaculate Heart Of Mary!!!


12 AUGUST 2015

First - a questions put forth by a reader: Has Russia been consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary?

Persecution: A Blessing in Disguise? by Michael Lofton August 12, 2015.
The answer from the Church_Militant_Moderator is YES! The Consecration to the Immaculate of Mary has been done!

This is further evidence that Gary Voris and crew are heretics and Gary is the forerunner to the Antichrist:

Along with Voris' defense of wicked Pope Francis, Voris' persecution of the SSPX and those laity who attend the SSPX masses

We can now add that

Voris believes that the Consecration to the Immaculate Heart of Mary has been done!

What new folly will Church Militant.Com embrace? Stay tuned.
Church_Militant_Moderator: 
EWTN gives a good response to this general question "Has Russia been consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary" https://www.ewtn.com/expert/an... A good historical dateline is provided there. 
Specifically, the Church has said that the consecration has been done and Sister Lucy appears to have confirmed this or, at least, said the consecration done has been "accepted" by Heaven. Therefore, to continue to "advocate" contrary to what the Church says in this regard is to sow division and distrust of the Church and, in effect, place Mary in opposition to the Vicar(s) of Christ. 
It is inconceivable that Our Lady would ask that Catholics listen to her and judge the popes and bishops as disobedient liars for not having obeyed her, but this is the practical effect of individuals and movements organized around "The Church has not obeyed Our Lady and is lying to us that they have." 
Think about it. Would Our Lady place herself above the Vicar of Christ and expect Catholics to obey her and ignore the Church? Even if it is true that popes and bishops have "disobeyed" the direct request of Our Lady (and I propose this for the sake of argument only) there is no way that Our Lady would encourage people, practically, to separate themselves from "submission to the Roman Pontiff" (part of the canonical definition of schism) and to submit to her instead. If one starts to follow Our Lady as "pope in practice," then we cease to follow the visible Church and the Vicar of Christ and create a kind of "Marian Catholic Church" in opposition to the visible "Roman Catholic Church." 
Since CM does, in fact, "submit to the Roman Pontiff" and the authority of the Church, and since the Church has said that the consecration has been done, who are we (or anyone else) to say that it has not? What fruits can come from continuing to insist that the consecration has not been done beyond increased separation of Catholics from the Chair of Peter? 
The Church says the consecration has been done. Sister Lucy confirmed that it has been done. Those who say it has not are already or well on their way into the dark land of schism. It is inconceivable to us that Our Lady would smile on those who have organized their lives and apostolates around "The Church has not obeyed Our Lady and is lying to us. Listen to Our Lady and ignore the Church." Church_Militant_Moderator
13 October 2015

New post on the miracle of the Sun:
Of interest is this comment:
Rambler • 14 hours ago Consecrate Russia to the immaculate Heart of Mary! 
rehtus333  Rambler • 12 hours ago It was in 1984. Russia is part of "World." Communism fell in Russia and Sister Lucy said the 1984 consecration was valid. 
Rambler  rehtus333 • 11 hours ago I used to think that too. But then I read into it more and I believe the full and public consecration of Russia alone must be completed.
Church Militant gives same response that yes the consecration has been done:
Church_Militant_Moderator Mod Rambler • 10 hours ago
EWTN gives a good response to this general question "Has Russia been consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary" https://www.ewtn.com/expert/an... A good historical dateline is provided there. 
To be specific, the Church has said that the consecration has been done and Sister Lucy appears to have confirmed this or, at least, said the consecration done has been "accepted" by Heaven. Therefore, to continue to "advocate" contrary to what the Church says in this regard is to sow division and distrust of the Church and, in effect, place Mary in opposition to the Vicar(s) of Christ. 
It is inconceivable that Our Lady would ask that Catholics listen to her and judge the popes and bishops as disobedient liars for not having obeyed her, but this is the practical effect of individuals and movements organized around "The Church has not obeyed Our Lady and is lying to us that they have." 
Think about it. Would Our Lady place herself above the Vicar of Christ and expect Catholics to obey her and ignore the Church? Even if it is true that popes and bishops have "disobeyed" the direct request of Our Lady (and I propose this for the sake of argument only) there is no way that Our Lady would encourage people, practically, to separate themselves from "submission to the Roman Pontiff" (part of the canonical definition of schism) and to submit to her instead. If one starts to follow Our Lady as "pope in practice," then we cease to follow the visible Church and the Vicar of Christ and create a kind of "Marian Catholic Church" in opposition to the visible "Roman Catholic Church." 
Since CM does, in fact, "submit to the Roman Pontiff" and the authority of the Church, and since the Church has said that the consecration has been done, who are we (or anyone else) to say that it has not? What fruits can come from continuing to insist that the consecration has not been done beyond increased separation of Catholics from the Chair of Peter? 
The Church says the consecration has been done. Sister Lucy confirmed that it has been done. Those who say it has not are already or well on their way into the dark land of schism. It is inconceivable to us that Our Lady would smile on those who have organized their lives and apostolates around "The Church has not obeyed Our Lady and is lying to us. Listen to Our Lady and ignore the Church."
Rambler Church_Militant_Moderator • 7 hours ago I am not saying that it has not been done. I saying that it should be done the way that the Virgin Mary asked for it to be done. Full public consecration of Russia. Not the world, not England along with Russia, but Russia specifically. I do think that a consecration was done that included Russia. But Russia has not been Consecrated directly. Much good has happened in regards to the consecration of the world, but the full consecration of Russia alone, as specified by Our Lady has not. So you can argue with my position all you like, everyone, even the Pope cannot deny what I am saying and many others agree with me. Also I watched an interview Michael Voris had with his father the other day and he seemed to make the same point I made. Also I watched an interview with Father Gabriele Amorth, former vatican exorcist, who also said the same thing. He went on to say, that although the consecration has been accepted, God is offended that the direct consecration of Russia has not been done as the Virgin Mary requested. He then went on to say that eventually the consecration will be done in full, but it will not be until very late... So this is not a schismatic point of view as you suggested.
Church Militant & Voris still hold that the fact that Consecration has been done. 

Voris is a heretic. The Only reason Voris holds to the Consecration being done is because Voris wants you to believe that the vision of the killing of the Fatima Pope has also been completed in the person of Pope John Paul II, so that this terrible event is behind us.

As this blog has warned time and again Voris is the main candidate to be the forerunner to the Antichrist who will one day murder the Fatima Pope and faithful thus earning his title as forerunner to the Anti-Christ.


Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Bizarre & Strange Same Day Voris Announces His View Is From 30,000ft A Baby Is Born At 30,00ft On China Airlines Flight

“A forerunner of the Antichrist, with his troops gathered from several nations, will fight against the true Christ, the only Saviour of the world. He will shed much blood and will want to annihilate the worship of God to make himself be looked upon as a God. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)
Wow! bizarre! Here is Gary the Forerunner to the Antichrist telling the world that his vision from 30,000ft:

SPECIAL SUNDAY VORTEX—MILITANT

Only things that ever reached 30,000 feet up are:
  1. The Smoke of Pagan Sacrifices
  2. The Waters of the Deluge
  3. The Tower of Babel
  4. The Fire of the Final Conflagration
  5. The Habitat of Demons

And of course modern day space and air travel - which none of you concern yourself with. You believe that it is normal for modern man to fly above the mountain tops 24/7 - non of you think of the consequences of such activity. Well there is a consequence and St Thomas warned you about the boundary established by the Blessed Trinity - 15 cubits above the mountains or about 29,050ft. Man is not allowed to pass over this boundary - but you scoff and so does Gary the Forerunner to the Antichrist.

Here is the deliberate hints that Voris makes while thumbing his nose at St. Thomas and God:
it's fitting to take a step back and look at this from a 30,000-foot view.

and that's the point of Militant: an honest, no-holds-barred, 30,000-foot view of what's going on.
WOW! Gary the Forerunner to the Antichrist is the first "saint" to declare that his gaze is above the 29,050 ft boundary established by God!

Here is just a few warnings:
The darksome atmosphere is as a prison to the demons until the judgment day. They carry fire of hell with them wherever they go. The devils besought the Lord not to cast them into the abyss; for they asked for this, deeming it to be a punishment for them to be cast out of a place where they could injure men. Hence it is stated,They besought Him that He would not expel them out of the country. St Thomas Aquinas

The demons of the air together with the Antichrist will perform great wonders on earth and in the atmosphere, and men will become more and more perverted. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)

For the time has come when the most astonishing wonders will take place on the earth and in the air. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)
Here is the article from Daily Mail about a baby being born above 30,000ft on the same day of Gary's announcement:


The darksome atmosphere is as a prison to the demons until the judgment day. They carry fire of hell with them wherever they go. The devils besought the Lord not to cast them into the abyss; for they asked for this, deeming it to be a punishment for them to be cast out of a place where they could injure men. Hence it is stated,They besought Him that He would not expel them out of the country. St Thomas Aquinas

The demons of the air together with the Antichrist will perform great wonders on earth and in the atmosphere, and men will become more and more perverted. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)

For the time has come when the most astonishing wonders will take place on the earth and in the air. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)

A China Airlines flight landed in Alaska with an extra passenger after an expectant mother gave birth to a baby girl more than eight weeks early. The Bali to Los Angeles flight was forced to make an emergency landing on Thursday after a Taiwanese passenger's waters broke six hours into the 19 hour journey. A doctor who happened to be on board the flight - which took off from Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport at 11.50pm on Wednesday - delivered the premature baby at 30,000ft after the crew asked passengers for medical help. Daily Mail Read More>>>>>>

Now for St Thomas on the habitat of Demons that everyone likes to ignore....happy flying....

Summa Th. I EN Qu.64 a.4
Article: 4 Whether our atmosphere is the demons' place of punishment?

Objection: 

1. It would seem that this atmosphere is not the demons' place of punishment. For a demon is a spiritual nature. But a spiritual nature is not affected by place. Therefore there is no place of punishment for demons.

2. Further, man's sin is not graver than the demons'. But man's place of punishment is hell. Much more, therefore, is it the demons' place of punishment; and consequently not the darksome atmosphere.

3. Further, the demons are punished with the pain of fire. But there is no fire in the darksome atmosphere. Therefore the darksome atmosphere is not the place of punishment for the demons.

On the contrary Augustine says (Gn ad lit. iii, 10), that "the darksome atmosphere is as a prison to the demons until the judgment day."

I answer that The angels in their own nature stand midway between God and men. Now the order of Divine providence so disposes, that it procures the welfare of the inferior orders through the superior. But man's welfare is disposed by Divine providence in two ways: first of all, directly, when a man is brought unto good and withheld from evil; and this is fittingly done through the good angels. In another way, indirectly, as when anyone assailed is exercised by fighting against opposition. It was fitting for this procuring of man's welfare to be brought about through the wicked spirits, lest they should cease to be of service in the natural order. Consequently a twofold place of punishment is due to the demons: one, by reason of their sin, and this is hell; and another, in order that they may tempt men, and thus the darksome atmosphere is their due place of punishment. Now the procuring of men's salvation is prolonged even to the judgment day: consequently, the ministry of the angels and wrestling with demons endure until then. Hence until then the good angels are sent to us here; and the demons are in this dark atmosphere for our trial: although some of them are even now in hell, to torment those whom they have led astray; just as some of the good angels are with the holy souls in heaven. But after the judgment day all the wicked, both men and angels, will be in hell, and the good in heaven.

Reply to Objection:

1. A place is not penal to angel or soul as if affecting the nature by changing it, but as affecting the will by saddening it: because the angel or the soul apprehends that it is in a place not agreeable to its will.

2. One soul is not set over another in the order of nature, as the demons are over men in the order of nature; consequently there is no parallel.

3. Some have maintained that the pain of sense for demons and souls is postponed until the judgment day: and that the beatitude of the saints is likewise postponed until the judgment day. But this is erroneous, and contrary to the teaching of the Apostle (2Co 5,1): "If our earthly house of this habitation be dissolved, we have a house in heaven." Others, again, while not admitting the same of souls, admit it as to demons. But it is better to say that the same judgment is passed upon wicked souls and wicked angels, even as on good souls and good angels.

Consequently, it must be said that, although a heavenly place belongs to the glory of the angels, yet their glory is not lessened by their coming to us, for they consider that place to be their own; in the same way as we say that the bishop's honor is not lessened while he is not actually sitting on his throne. In like manner it must be said, that although the demons are not actually bound within the fire of hell while they are in this dark atmosphere, nevertheless their punishment is none the less; because they know that such confinement is their due. Hence it is said in a gloss upon Jc 3,6: "They carry fire of hell with them wherever they go." Nor is this contrary to what is said (Lc 8,31), "They besought the Lord not to cast them into the abyss"; for they asked for this, deeming it to be a punishment for them to be cast out of a place where they could injure men. Hence it is stated, "They [Vulg. 'He'] besought Him that He would not expel them [Vulg. 'him'] out of the country" (Mc 5,10).

Sunday, October 11, 2015

WOW! Voris Declares His Gaze Is From 30,000ft Up And Looking Down On Us! Above The Mountain Tops! Higher Than The Waters Of The Deluge! Taller Than The Tower of Babel! Places Himself In The Habitat Of Demons!!

“A forerunner of the Antichrist, with his troops gathered from several nations, will fight against the true Christ, the only Saviour of the world. He will shed much blood and will want to annihilate the worship of God to make himself be looked upon as a God. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)
No one is paying attention to the hints Voris gives during his Votex videos. The man is hinted that he is indeed the forerunner to the Antichrist.

He did this today:

SPECIAL SUNDAY VORTEX—MILITANT

He makes a bizarre claim that his gaze is from 30,000 ft up!

Only things that ever reached 30,000 feet up are:
  1. The Smoke of Pagan Sacrifices
  2. The Waters of the Deluge
  3. The Tower of Babel
  4. The Fire of the Final Conflagration
  5. The Habitat of Demons

And of course modern day space and air travel - which none of you concern yourself with. You believe that it is normal for modern man to fly above the mountain tops 24/7 - non of you think of the consequences of such activity. Well there is a consequence and St Thomas warned you about the boundary established by the Blessed Trinity - 15 cubits above the mountains or about 29,050ft. Man is not allowed to pass over this boundary - but you scoff and so does Gary the Forerunner to the Antichrist.

Here is the deliberate hints that Voris makes while thumbing his nose at St. Thomas and God:
it's fitting to take a step back and look at this from a 30,000-foot view.

and that's the point of Militant: an honest, no-holds-barred, 30,000-foot view of what's going on.
WOW! Gary the Forerunner to the Antichrist is the first "saint" to declare that his gaze is above the 29,050 ft boundary established by God!

Here is just a few warnings:
The darksome atmosphere is as a prison to the demons until the judgment day. They carry fire of hell with them wherever they go. The devils besought the Lord not to cast them into the abyss; for they asked for this, deeming it to be a punishment for them to be cast out of a place where they could injure men. Hence it is stated,They besought Him that He would not expel them out of the country. St Thomas Aquinas

The demons of the air together with the Antichrist will perform great wonders on earth and in the atmosphere, and men will become more and more perverted. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)

For the time has come when the most astonishing wonders will take place on the earth and in the air. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)
Now for the complete article by St Thomas on the habitat of Demons that everyone likes to ignore....happy flying....

Summa Th. I EN Qu.64 a.4
Article: 4 Whether our atmosphere is the demons' place of punishment?

Objection: 

1. It would seem that this atmosphere is not the demons' place of punishment. For a demon is a spiritual nature. But a spiritual nature is not affected by place. Therefore there is no place of punishment for demons.

2. Further, man's sin is not graver than the demons'. But man's place of punishment is hell. Much more, therefore, is it the demons' place of punishment; and consequently not the darksome atmosphere.

3. Further, the demons are punished with the pain of fire. But there is no fire in the darksome atmosphere. Therefore the darksome atmosphere is not the place of punishment for the demons.

On the contrary Augustine says (Gn ad lit. iii, 10), that "the darksome atmosphere is as a prison to the demons until the judgment day."

I answer that The angels in their own nature stand midway between God and men. Now the order of Divine providence so disposes, that it procures the welfare of the inferior orders through the superior. But man's welfare is disposed by Divine providence in two ways: first of all, directly, when a man is brought unto good and withheld from evil; and this is fittingly done through the good angels. In another way, indirectly, as when anyone assailed is exercised by fighting against opposition. It was fitting for this procuring of man's welfare to be brought about through the wicked spirits, lest they should cease to be of service in the natural order. Consequently a twofold place of punishment is due to the demons: one, by reason of their sin, and this is hell; and another, in order that they may tempt men, and thus the darksome atmosphere is their due place of punishment. Now the procuring of men's salvation is prolonged even to the judgment day: consequently, the ministry of the angels and wrestling with demons endure until then. Hence until then the good angels are sent to us here; and the demons are in this dark atmosphere for our trial: although some of them are even now in hell, to torment those whom they have led astray; just as some of the good angels are with the holy souls in heaven. But after the judgment day all the wicked, both men and angels, will be in hell, and the good in heaven.

Reply to Objection:

1. A place is not penal to angel or soul as if affecting the nature by changing it, but as affecting the will by saddening it: because the angel or the soul apprehends that it is in a place not agreeable to its will.

2. One soul is not set over another in the order of nature, as the demons are over men in the order of nature; consequently there is no parallel.

3. Some have maintained that the pain of sense for demons and souls is postponed until the judgment day: and that the beatitude of the saints is likewise postponed until the judgment day. But this is erroneous, and contrary to the teaching of the Apostle (2Co 5,1): "If our earthly house of this habitation be dissolved, we have a house in heaven." Others, again, while not admitting the same of souls, admit it as to demons. But it is better to say that the same judgment is passed upon wicked souls and wicked angels, even as on good souls and good angels.

Consequently, it must be said that, although a heavenly place belongs to the glory of the angels, yet their glory is not lessened by their coming to us, for they consider that place to be their own; in the same way as we say that the bishop's honor is not lessened while he is not actually sitting on his throne. In like manner it must be said, that although the demons are not actually bound within the fire of hell while they are in this dark atmosphere, nevertheless their punishment is none the less; because they know that such confinement is their due. Hence it is said in a gloss upon Jc 3,6: "They carry fire of hell with them wherever they go." Nor is this contrary to what is said (Lc 8,31), "They besought the Lord not to cast them into the abyss"; for they asked for this, deeming it to be a punishment for them to be cast out of a place where they could injure men. Hence it is stated, "They [Vulg. 'He'] besought Him that He would not expel them [Vulg. 'him'] out of the country" (Mc 5,10).


A TREATISE OF ANTICHRIST: Where Is Declared That Antichrist Shall Be One Single Man


CHAPTER ONE

Where is declared that Antichrist shall be one single man.

This is proved by the holy scriptures & fathers, which treat of Antichrist. John 5.43 I am come in the name of my father, and ye have not received me, if another come in his own name, him ye will receive.

Now that these words are understood of one single person, which shall be Antichrist, St Chrysostom and St. Cyril do testify. Who write upon this place, also St. Ambrose upon the 2.to the Thess.2. verse and St. Augustine in his 29 treatise upon St. John.

Moreover Christ opposite here unto himself another man (that is to say) person to person, not kingdom to kingdom, neither sect to sect, as is manifestly clear by these words; I, another, in my name, in his name, me, him; Therefore as Christ was one single man, so likewise Antichrist shall be one single man, which is against Calvin in his commentaries upon this place, which understandeth it of false prophets in general, and not of any one certain person.


Also Christ saith here that Antichrist shall be received by the Jews for their Messias, and it is most evident that they do expect one certain person.

Also all the false prophets, did come in the name of another, and not in their own. Jeremy the 14. chap.14.verse. The prophet prophesy falsely in my name. I did not send them But our lord speaketh here of a certain man, which shall come in his own name (to wit) who shall not acknowledge any God, but shall extoll himself (as seethe the Apostle) above all that is called God.

A TREATISE OF ANTICHRIST 
BY M. Andrew Cryghton 
Scottish Priest 
1620

Saturday, October 10, 2015

Gary The Forerunner To The Antichrist Has A New Out About Him & His Hair! First Full-Length Book by Michael Voris

LOL!
“A forerunner of the Antichrist, with his troops gathered from several nations, will fight against the true Christ, the only Saviour of the world. He will shed much blood and will want to annihilate the worship of God to make himself be looked upon as a God. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)
First Full-Length Book by Michael Voris
ChurchMilitant.com announces first publication by Michael Voris: Militant: Resurrecting Authentic Catholicism

"It's time for a generation to rise up and start being militant about the Faith again," Michael Voris said when asked about the reason for writing his first book. Michael Voris was born in 1961, very near the beginning of the Second Vatican Council. The Council produced an air of enthusiasm and excitement that was quickly labeled the "Spirit of Vatican II." The problem was the "Spirit" bore little resemblance to the reality of the Council. In the ensuing fifty years, using the "Spirit" as a cover, the Church has been dismantled and attacked by various clergy and religious aching for change. As a result, the Faith has been devastated on all fronts. This devastation is not owing to the culture, as many like to think. Rather, the culture has sunk to the level it has because Church leaders have not done their job. Read More>>>>>



Sunday, October 4, 2015

Solange Hertz, RIP: Little Apocalypse of Our Lady On THE SECRET OF OUR LADY OF LA SALETTE


Little Apocalypse of Our Lady
by Solange Hertz

"Well, now, my children, you will pass this along to all my people."

With these words Mary the Mother of God concluded the famous message she came to earth on September 19, 1846 to deliver to two poor peasant children employed as cowherds on the mountain of La Salette, Famous as the message is, its full contents continue unknown to the vast majority, not only in the world, but even in the Church. This leads one to wonder who "all Mary's people" really are, for only these, it would seem, does it succeed in reaching, as our Lady said it would.

She didn't ask the children, Melanie Calvat and Maximin Giraud, to pass it along. She simply told then they would, and that was that. And they have. Somehow, in every generation since, little souls are found who transmit our Lady's words faithfully and quietly, although for the most part painfully, by the most humble, nay, bumbling means, please God this may be one of them.

Outside the Gospel itself, hardly any communication from heaven has encountered such furious and determined opposition, and that not so much outside the Church, as from within, from those members who would be most expected to take the Secret to heart and preach it from the housetops. It has continued unabated, despite the fact that the apparition at La Salette enjoyed almost immediately the full approbation of the Church, with rich indulgences granted to pilgrims there, and that canonically approved miracles have taken place on the spot. Why?

"Alas," wrote Melanie to her director Abbé Combe in 1903, "the bishops, those who considered themselves referred to in the Secret, are the enemies of this merciful Secret, just as the high priests condemned the divine Savior to death! . . . And inasmuch as the Mother of God and of all Christians by adoption at the foot of the Cross has recommended that her message in its entirety be made known to her people, what are we waiting for to obey the Virgin Mother, seeing that every day we behold the punishments announced by the Secret taking place?

"What more are we waiting for, inasmuch as Holy Church has shown herself in favor insofar as She can where revelations are concerned? Pius IX ordered the Bishop of Grenoble to build a beautiful Church on the mountain of La Salette. Leo XIII crowned the statue and gave the sanctuary the title of Basilica. What more do we need to beat our breasts, to admit that all, all of us, have sinned, all of us have provoked God's justice, all of us have set our lips to the poisoned fount of our depraved passions, drunkenness from which plunges us into darkness? Whoever is ill-willed in regulating his life according to the law of God, according to the maxims of the Gospel, will always find reasons for doubting everything he wants to be in doubt about; the faith of these people is not a sanctifying faith. . ." (Documents Pour Servir á l'Histoire Réelle de La Salette, Nouvelles Editions Latines, Paris, 1963-66)

In our days the Secret has been largely consigned to oblivion. In the lifetime of the visionaries some confessors refused absolution to penitents who read it. Melanie and Maximin were subjected to unparalleled and totally unfounded calumny and persecution. Melanie's own Bishop, along with many other persons, made her out as insane, or at best unstable. Maximin was reputed an alcoholic. To this day, at best, the general judgment would agree with that expressed by Fr. John Kennedy in his Light on the Mountain: "The deficiencies and idiosyncrasies of Maximin and Melanie are but gargoyles on the monumental, enduring fact of La Salette." La Salette, yes" Maximin, Melanie and the Secret, no.

After receiving the first communication from our Lady dealing with the divine displeasure at profanations of Sunday and the Holy Name - generally propagated as the Message of La Salette and beyond the limits of this paper - both children were entrusted with a secret. Maximin's, apparently never intended for the public, was carried to the grave with him. Melanie's, however, was meant to be revealed in due time: and the moment she began doing so in obedience to heaven, she attracted the full brunt of hell's fury.

Many good people when they heard it were convinced that Melanie had made it up, so sure were they our Lady would never say such terrible things about the clergy. And if it's true, what good does it do to reveal it?

To which Mélanie replied: "No, no, the Seat of Wisdom never spoke ill of the Ministers of the Altar! Mercifully, Mary, Patroness of France. Queen of the Catholic clergy, pointed out the diseases infecting the souls of the pastors of God's people. Those who have forgotten prayer and penance and filled their hearts with affection for transitory things, their faith has cooled. . . Instead of rebelling, they should have entered into themselves, revived their faith, their charity, wisely regulating their conduct in accordance with the examples of Jesus, our divine Master and model," (Letter to Fr. Combe, September 1902)

That Pius IX believed in Mélanie absolutely, indeed countering her detractors with, "Melanie is a good girl," seemed to weigh little in her favor. Nor did the fact that he later relieved her of her religious vows, which would have kept her in the cloister where the enemies of the Secret wanted her kept, even going so far as trying to do so forcibly. She tells us, "His holiness Pius IX relieved me of such vows as could not be kept in the world; he said that I couldn't accomplish my mission in the cloister and he granted me privileges I would never have dared ask him."

Badgered beyond endurance, even excommunicated by one French Bishop, Melanie eventually fled incognito to Italy, to publish the Secret there under the protection of friendly Italian prelates. Pope Leo XIII, who approved of Melanie as heartily as his predecessor, called her to Rome in 1879 to confer with her not only about the Secret, but about a rule for a religious order which our Lady had given her at the same time and wished founded immediately against the coming crisis. Specifically the Order of the Mother of God, the "Apostles of the Latter Times" predicted by St, Louis de Montfort, it was encouraged in every way by the Pope, who in fact kept Melanie in Rome six months finalizing its Constitutions, but despite several abortive attempts, it always failed to materialize. (The present religious organized under the name of La Salette do not follow this rule, nor are they in any way connected with it.) This great work is yet to come.

The ire of the French bishops, whom Melanie knew to be masonically controlled pursued her even into Italy, where she was driven from pillar to post in her attempt to remain hidden from the world. Applying heavy pressure on Rome to have the Secret put on the Index, these high ecclesiastics even threatened to withhold Peter's Pence from the impoverished Apostolic treasury. This was never done, but to placate them Cardinal Caterini sent a letter from the Inquisition forbidding Melanie in 1880 to write about or publish anything further on the Secret.

"This unhappy letter has finished, you might say, poisoning my existence," said poor Melanie," and has evaporated my trembling hope that by Christianity's return to its God the long and great scourges which our prevarications deserve might be much mitigated." In great anguish she complied with the letter. "As for me, I want to be submissive to the Holy Church of God." Nevertheless she conceded that if she could be certain "that the Caterini letter was unknown to the Holy Father, then I would be free to write and would write." (Letter to A. M. Schmid, of the periodical Légitimité, July 25, 1896).

Apparently never accorded this certainty, she continued obedient. Contrary to her detractors, Melanie's life was one of high virtue, austerity and prayer, her apparent eccentricities and "instability" due almost entirely to her fidelity to her mission and her determination to keep herself and her many extraordinary gifts (among them the stigmata) hidden from public view. On reading an account of her life in 1910, Pope St. Pius X exclaimed to the Bishop of Altamura, in whose diocese she had died and was buried, "La nostra Santa!" He suggested to the Bishop that her cause for beatification be introduced immediately.

Testimony to her holiness is plentiful if one knows where to look, but that of the Fr. Rigaux, her last director, should suffice: "In the 48 years that I've been a priest, I've known and directed some very beautiful souls. I dare state before God, who will soon judge me, that never have I encountered a soul so humble, gentle, pure, obedient a virgin so pure, a character so strong, a victim so resigned in frightful trials, a martyr in body, bearing the stigmata from her tenderest years."

Melanie died at the age of 72, alone and unattended, on December 14, 1904, but she left us the Secret. It's extraordinary how many people today are still hesitant about reading it, let alone believing it, because they think it was on the Index. Nothing could be further from the truth. Although it's true that several publications dealing with it were condemned - some of them with very good reason - the Secret itself has never suffered any official condemnation. As a matter of fact there is extant a letter from Fr. Lepidi, Master of the Sacred Palace, dated December 16, 1912 to Cardinal Luçon, stating officially, that the Secret of La Salette has never been condemned by the Index nor by the Holy Office.

Delivered orally hundreds of times by Melanie herself. It was first published under the Imprimatur of the Bishop of Naples. It appeared a second time under the Imprimatur of Salvatore Zola, Bishop of Lecce, Italy, who gave his permission after consulting with Leo XIII on the matter. This edition was reprinted ne varietur in France in 1904, a few months before Melanie died.

In the meantime the full text had been examined by the congregation of the Index, which found no change necessary. When Leo XIII read it initially, not only did he voice no objection, but he ordered a version with fuller explanations to be undertaken! The Bishops of Arras and bayonne granted further Imprimaturs in 1893, followed by many others throughout Christendom. Fr. Rigaux, writing around the turn of the century, stated that he had in his possession "28 editions of the Secret, with Imprimatur from Cardinals and Bishops."

Nevertheless, as Mélanie wrote then, "With Imprimatur and all the Imprimaturs, I wonder who will believe the teachings of an apparition, when almost the whole Church of God no longer believes in the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. Or if she does believe, it's only with the faith of the intellect and not with the faith of the will." (May 19, 1904) Although never placed on the Index, the Secret suffered grievous impediments due to the cause Melanie saw so well. It must be forcibly noted here that by a decree of the Holy Office dated December 21, 1915, all the faithful are forbidden to write commentaries or interpretations of the Secret. As far as can be ascertained, this decree is still in effect and must be obeyed.

But are commentaries really necessary? As Mélanie told her director in 1903, "souls who are God's friends can guess the Secret's meaning without help, and the others won't want to because it applies to them too closely." When all is said and done, "The Secret only proposes observance of God's law, and complains of the lack of observance of this same law, and it threatens the transgressors of this holy law with chastisements and scourges." Pope Plus IX summed it up even more briefly: "If you don't do penance you will perish!"

If this was clear at the turn of the century. It's even clearer now for those with eyes to see. Hardly any soul of good will needs help interpreting the Secret of La Salette today. It has become an open secret if ever there was one. In the same letter to her director just quoted Melanie explained to him exactly the sort of thing our Lady was referring to when she said, "There are two holy places: the Church and the spouse, or if you prefer, the soul which no longer belongs to herself. In 1865 there passed like a gust of rebellion: an archbishop who poisoned a king; cardinals and others sold the great See of Catholicism, after having become fathers several times, and events of like nature, it's a long story. But nobody knows about it you say? Haven't we heard tell that Napoleon, Garibaldi, Gambetta and certain priests were in the habit of visiting convents from time to tine, that they were very charitable towards these nuns? and that in other countries or kingdoms the rendezvous took place in churches? And hasn't Freemasonry been solemnly established, that is to say, recognized? But it's useless. I'm not capable of uncovering the stratagems, the brood of crimes which only apathy and frenzy for pleasure have hidden from the eyes of those who already no longer see. We shall see: it's not everyone who will see, but those souls nearest to the spotless light!" She concludes, "At most we can say that God is reproaching us with the same crimes which caused the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah to perish by fire from heaven."

The prohibition against her publishing anything about the Secret must have weighed on her ever more heavily as she saw public morality sink lower and lower, for apparently she had been given to understand very much more than our Lady's words conveyed on the surface. Speaking of the apparition she says, "Each word develops and the future action takes place within the moment, and thousands and thousands more things are seen than the ears hear...One sees plots hatching, one sees the kings of the earth, each of whom has several guardian angels; one sees them moving about, doing, undoing; one sees the jealousy of some, the ambition of others, etc., and all that in one word escaping from the lips of her who makes hell tremble." (Letter to Fr. Bliard) In 1897 she mourned to Fr. Combe, "God used to speak continually to His prophets and they weren't held to obedience to...when this was contrary to God's will. Today one must obey or be struck with excommunication. I can only groan at the lamentable state of our loving Jesus' representatives..."

Yet, even given permission, Mélanie would have been powerless to transmit it all. To the pious and zealous Fr. Roubaud - who had hoped in the beginning to publish a volume on the subject from her pen - she said, "I don't feel I have the grace to explain. The world isn't disposed to hear it. What's more, the little people of God don't need to touch with the finger. Our sweet Mother Mary didn't come for believers, but for those who don't practice the promises made at their baptism." She had prefaced this with the rueful comment, "It's possible, and it's even certain, that the Jews will re-assume their title of people of God and perhaps we shall be rejected."

Melanie was not acquainted with the famous prophecy of St. Malachy, but in 1894 she told this good priest that among the future events she saw unrolling in the course of the apparition, "I didn't see, I don't see, any Great Pope or Great Monarch before an extremely great tribulation, horrifying, terrible and general for all Christendom. But before that time, twice there will be a short-lived peace two shaky, servile, doubtful popes."

Anyone who thinks the crisis In the Church we suffer today began with the Second Vatican Council need only read Melanie's correspondence. The following extracts from her letters to Fr. Roubaud are a fair sample:

"When the Secret has been scorned, misunderstood ... held back for money, one must be surprised at nothing. The Church will endure forever, our Lord said so; but among the teaching members of the Church, what traitors, what apostates, what mercenaries, what sectarians, who bear the imprint or the sign of the beast with ten horns St. John speaks of in his vision on Patmos! But this beast similar to the Lamb, who rises out of the earth, isn't it the figure of faithless ecclesiastics? I firmly believe so. Happy those who die in God's grace, for those who live will see sad and terrifying things. We still haven't reached the beginning of the end." (January 2, 1892)

Later the same year, her words apropos of a good priest who was losing his eyesight have sadly increased in relevance today: "Oh, how God afflicts His true servants in these times! But this affliction is a punishment for the half-Christians who have rendered themselves unworthy of hearing the word of truth, which they obstinately refuse to put into practice. When God favored us, when He was giving us all we needed, we abandoned Him; now we blaspheme Him like the damned. God was giving us His graces in manifold ways, now He deprives us of everything. [36] He plays deaf, indifferent, as we did towards Him. We have nothing to say. And now He is taking from us the few good priests who, despite all the thunderbolts of those sold for gold, never ceased teaching us the practice of the Christi virtues and flight from sin...

"... You'd think the devil would keep quiet inasmuch as men are almost all working for him, for his triumph. Well, no, he turns himself into an angel of light, aping true apparitions, truly divine. Later he'll show his horns, in order to destroy the true divine apparitions by his impostures. It's noteworthy that in all these false apparition there are always many flattering words directed to certain persons, which these seers, seeing only the devil, apply to some gullible person wrapt in refined self-love. It's also true there are visionaries without visions, who don't even need the devil's help, being themselves possessed."

The rash of false signs and wonders, tongues and prophecies soliciting our attention so generally now was evidently well under way in the last century. On September 9, 1894, she writes, "The devil is a liar, what he says mustn't be believed because if he says something true, it's preceded and followed by lies and wrapped In obscurity. The good Lord doesn't permit His true worshippers to be playthings of evil spirits at their expense. Today already in the world, in families (Christian in appearance) there are supernatural-diabolic things; these are treated as illness, and bit by bit the serpent's wonders insinuate themselves noiselessly into society - Mistrust of self, deep and true humility, supreme love of God alone can deliver these souls from the eternal abysses. It seems to me, if I'm not mistaken, that we don't have to wait for the reign of the Antichrist to see apostates behind masks; today we have a great number, whom Satan recognizes as his own. The sentinels of the sanctuary have passed into the enemy camp!!! The divine supernatural has been scorned! We'll be taken in the nets of the diabolic supernatural."

Sad to say, that Melanie prophesied truly here can now be demonstrated. All the more reason, therefore, to heed the Secret. Why risk setting our sights to doubtful prophecies from lesser sources? The words of the greatest saints can never measure up to those of the Mother of God, whose motherly apocalypse could rank second only to that of our Lord himself spoken in the Gospels and through St. John on Patmos.

With this thought in mind we can proceed to a first hand reading of the authentic Secret. The accompanying part is that of the definitive 1904 edition, of which Melanie said in April of that year to Fr. Rigaux: "The Secret is word for word that of our gentle Mother, just as I gave it to His Holiness Leo XIII in 1879." The following October she wrote, "I protest highly against a differing text, which people may dare publish after my death, I protest once more against the very false statements of all those who dare say and write: First, that I embroidered the Secret; second, against those who state that the Queen of Wisdom did not say to transmit the Secret to all her people."

We might note here that the Secret was given to Mélanie in French. Although she spoke only patois at the tine and learned French later, she was able to understand the message, and retained it perfectly word for word. When a gentleman asked her as a child how such a thing was possible, she answered, simply, "I don't know. If the holy Virgin so willed it, sir, I understood." Our translation may be rather stiff in spots, but every effort was made to hew as closely as possible to the original, inasmuch as in a communication of this kind a change in the nuance of one word can shift the interpretation.

The Secret must be allowed to speak for itself, coming to us as it does from our Lady herself. A true apocalypse, it must be read like all apocalyptic literature, which uses enigma and metaphor precisely so that only those for whom it is intended may grasp its true meaning. Let him who reads understand. Our Lady's own people, by supernatural instinct, will know not to take its terms in their purely literal sense, any more than they would in reading the Apocalypse of St. John. For instance, they would know better than to take in a carnal sense the "Hebrew nun," the "false virgin" who is to bear the Antichrist as a result of relations with a Bishop. Genuine apocalyptic messages deal primarily in spiritual matters. These are clothed in material imagery designed to give the clue to the meaning, but which remains secondary. Nor is there any strict chronology sometimes the same event is described in different ways.

Even so, only the light of the Holy Ghost, supported by prayer, penance and innocence of life can unlock divine mysteries for the human intellect, which no amount of purely human explanation can enlighten in such matters. This makes obeying the Decree of 1915 rather easy, for as Melanie said, commentaries are largely useless anyway.

Who will not heed Mélanie may heed St. Gregory the Great: "... Unless the same Spirit is in the heart of the one who learns, unprofitable is the word of the teacher ... Unless He is within who will teach us, the tongue of the teacher labors in vain. All alike hear the voice of the speaker, yet all do not understand alike the meaning of the words they hear. Since the word is the same, why do your hearts not understand alike, if not for the reason that, although the voice of the speaker is directed towards all, it is the Master within us who teaches us what is said, and some more than others?" (Serno 30 In Evangelia)

We can do no better than to introduce the Secret with the same words Melanie used before setting down her recital of the marvelous happening at La Salette:

"I obey the most holy Virgin Mother of God and Mother of all believers. I submit this publication to the judgment of the Holy Apostolic See, and I declare condemned in advance all found therein contrary to Catholic doctrine:"

Copyright Solange Hertz 1974

MARIA OF THE CROSS, 
Victim of Jesus nee MELANIE CALVAT, 
Shepherdess of La Salette
"I protest highly against a different text, which people may dare publish after my death. I protest once more against the very false statements of all those who dare say and write First that I embroidered the Secret; second, against those who state that the Queen Mother did not say to transmit the Secret to all her people." Melanie